Stop the War! Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Stop the War!

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (16137)	4/30/2003 5:00:11 AM
From: Vitas	Read Replies (1) of 21614

The support for the war came not from one country's claim(s) but from FINDINGS OF FACT by the multinational U.N. Security Council: "SECURITY COUNCIL HOLDS IRAQ IN ‘MATERIAL BREACH’ OF DISARMAMENT OBLIGATIONS, OFFERS FINAL CHANCE TO COMPLY, UNANIMOUSLY ADOPTING RESOLUTION 1441 (2002) Instructs Weapons Inspections to Resume within 45 Days, Recalls Repeated Warning of ‘Serious Consequences’ for Continued Violations Holding Iraq in “material breach” of its obligations under previous resolutions, the Security Council this morning decided to afford it a “final opportunity to comply” with its disarmament obligations, while setting up an enhanced inspection regime for full and verified completion of the disarmament process established by resolution 687 (1991)." Message 18634976 and from Dr. Blix' FINDINGS OF FACT: "Blix Says No Iraqi 'Fundamental Decision' to Disarm" Message 18632767 Saddam had the opportunity to comply and he choose not to. It is entirely Saddam's fault he choose to not cooperate with the U.N., to file a fraudulent answer on December 7, 2002, and did not make, in Dr. Blix words, the "fundamental decision to disarm". Nobody else is at fault.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next