Formerly About Applied Materials Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Applied Materials

AMAT 269.55

+0.3%

3:59 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Cary Salsberg who wrote (70136)	4/30/2003 12:41:32 PM
From: zonder	Read Replies (1) of 70976

I don't know whether there was even a possibility of bringing a counter-offer to the table or if it was a "take it or leave it" thing. The points of rejection were obvious enough. If the Israeli side would not bulge on any of them, then they have already rejected a possible counter-offer, right? I certainly accept that it was unacceptable to the Pals. It was unacceptable to many Israelis. Yet, it was, by far, the best offer, to date And hence, should be accepted? And its rejection means Palestinians are only interested in destroying Israel? Not sure about that... There was an improved offer made at Taba after this "Barak Offer" Could you shortly explain what the improvements were? I am not that familiar with the Taba version.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next