Foreign Affairs Discussion Group Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Dayuhan who wrote (96863)	4/30/2003 12:41:35 PM
From: Brian Sullivan	Read Replies (1) of 281500

One thing that we have to accept is that despite all the talk of financial interests here and there, these countries ultimately had no choice but to reject the war, because their populations were overwhelmingly opposed to it. That's the nature of democracy, and the logic of trying to impose trade penalties on a nation because their people don't always agree with our policies escapes me utterly. It is one thing to state that you oppose the invasion of Iraq and it is quite another to send your foreign minister to every South American and African country serving in the Security council to round up more votes for your anti-US position. Also if you are a country that has a veto privilege in the UN you have to think very carefully because using you veto would undermine the United Nations. This is why you will find that China typically abstains on almost every issue that they oppose rather than use their veto. China pretty much reserves their veto for issues involving Taiwan. However you have France going around yelling that they will veto anything with the words Iraq in it, and they announce this publicly before a second resolution was even written.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next