SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Stop the War!

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: rrufff who wrote (16385)5/1/2003 12:03:30 PM
From: zonder  Read Replies (1) of 21614
 
Sorry but why did you launch into discussing whether or not UN is "relevant"? Does this mean you see what I mean re Vitas' statements that I objected to? Then hopefully you can explain to him in private, in words he will understand :-)

UN is pretty much irrelevant, but that's my opinion

And mine is that it is a very bizarre suggestion that the "relevance" of an organization depends on its unconditional support of its most powerful member.

I'm not convinced that UN failure to go along with US was based on morality. IMO, it was based on financial dealings

Who told you it HAD to be just on "morality"???

As with all international issues, countries took sides on this one as well on the basis of (1) Benefits to their own citizens, and (2) What they think is "right".

It was no different for the US. Unless you want to argue that Bush did not have the interests of Americans in mind at all when invading Iraq...

full disclosure would require France and Russia to state that force would jeopardize their more than $10 billion investment and loans

Are you under the impressiont that Iraq's debt repayments are now "jeopardized"? That is strange. I thought countries' sovereign debts did not just evaporate each time their government, or even form of government, changed.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext