Dear, you pestered me with your claim that Blix' statement was opinion rather than fact, and have yet to prove your statement. YOU are pestering ME with dribble which you are unable to substantiate.
The U.N. not supporting the war is nothing more than coffee talk unless the Security Council enacts a new resolution proscribing the war, which they did not do.
-------------------------------------------------------------
"It was always clear that Hans Blix's job was to state the facts."
itv.com
“It was a disappointment that Iraq's Declaration of 7 December did not bring new documentary evidence.”
“When proscribed items are deemed unaccounted for it is above all credible accounts that is needed - or the proscribed items, if they exist.”
“However, even if the use of advanced technology could quantify the amount of anthrax, said to be dumped at the site, the results would still be open to interpretation.
Defining the quantity of anthrax destroyed must, of course, be followed by efforts to establish what quantity was actually produced.”
“Against this background, the question is now asked whether Iraq has cooperated immediately, unconditionally and actively - with Unmovic, as required under paragraph 9 of resolution 1441 (2002).
The answers can be seen from the factual descriptions I have provided.”
"cannot be said to constitute 'immediate' cooperation”
itv.com
"the factual descriptions I have provided”
"the factual descriptions I have provided”
"the factual descriptions I have provided”
"the factual descriptions I have provided”
"the factual descriptions I have provided”
"the factual descriptions I have provided”
"the factual descriptions I have provided”
"the factual descriptions I have provided”
"the factual descriptions I have provided”
"the factual descriptions I have provided” |
