SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Raptor's Den II

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Prophet who wrote (850)5/2/2003 11:46:20 AM
From: Kirk ©  Read Replies (1) of 3432
 
If the NAZ moves up one more point it will explode. All indicators are pointing to a drop.

I believe indicators are a way to trap people... everyone gravitates to what is working until they stop working. Could be a good way for the "smart money" to try and take money from us small guys and gals. After 3 yrs of a bear, I find most only look at indicators like VXN, VIX, etc. for the length of the bear and forget that some of these were much more extreme in 1999. People on a medium term (1-3 yrs) winning streak have short memories perhaps?

Yes, I've been thinking this is setting up an inverted head and shoulder and 1500 is the neckline

stockcharts.com[h,a]dhclyymy[d20020601,20031231][pc20,50!d20,2!f][pc20!c50!i!d20,2!b100!b200!f][vc60][iut!Uo14!La12,26,9!Lh14,3!Lc20]

We kinda got a double headed monster and droopy shoulders but I think the key is to be flexible and look for overall idea of the iH&S...

Looking at that chart even longer term, it looks like a big handle on a cup with handle.

but most of the message board TA guru's are bearish... so I still hate to sound bullish and look a fool... but being long has been the answer since last Fall. How long it continues is anyone's guess.. but I agree that if we get a few pts higher then 300 more is not out of the question.

Head n shoulder, cup with handles on medium to short term is real support and resistance levels that even academics agree are valid statistically. I can't even seem to find eWave people who agree on how to read them so I've stuck to simpler stuff. It will be interesting to see who is right. I don't move much money on TA as I just use it to try to get better times and price points to go with asset allocation, but I do enjoy the discussion.

cheers
Kirk out

PS Who was it that said "to da moon!" ? -vbg
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext