SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: LindyBill who wrote (97304)5/2/2003 10:48:25 PM
From: Nadine Carroll  Read Replies (3) of 281500
 
Just saw Inside Washington, my favorite talking heads program, with Nina Totenburg, Jack Beatty, Evan Thomas and Charles Krauthammer.

Krauthammer spoke well of Abu Mazen, which surprised and impressed me. He said Abu Mazen used to be Arafat, but he changed his mind. Now he knows that terror is a dead-end road. But the transition of power is incomplete (that's putting it mildly) and it's useless to negotiate while Arafat is still in power.

Then Totenburg and Beatty, on cue, began going on how Bush had to really get involved and pressure both sides to make the process work. Krauthammer just asked, what is it that Bush is supposed to do?

They had no specific answer, having gotten the wrong end of the stick. Once the two parties want to make peace, then an American President can make the deal happen by cajoling, bribing, threatening, whatever. If the two parties don't want the peace, it won't happen. Maybe Abu Mazen does want the peace, but Arafat does not. Hamas certainly does not want the peace, and Arafat has always permitted Hamas to flourish. When the Israelis see a Palestinian government make a serious attempt to put down Hamas, then Israeli rollbacks will occur and then negotiations will be fruitful. Not before.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext