SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: NightOwl who wrote (97217)5/4/2003 12:08:37 AM
From: Dayuhan  Read Replies (1) of 281500
 

Suffice to say that whatever we do… it will most definitely be done with our interests at the forefront. Moreover, I am now completely at a loss as to why anyone would think that we should, or even want us to, do otherwise.

I think you might find an Iraqi or two who might be slightly uncomfortable with the notion that everything we will do in Iraq will be done to further our own interests. Their perception of their interests is not likely to be completely aligned with our perception of our interests.

The question remains: if it becomes clear, as it probably will, that a democratically elected government in Iraq will pursue policies not in accordance with our interests, which should we prioritize: our own interests or our commitment to democracy.

Sooner or later the last of us will "die" off. Until then, barring the arrival of ALIEN beasts, I see scant prospects for any one of our "groups" gaining universal adoption, integration or even acceptance… all evidence of record that I have ever seen, suggests that life itself is inconsistent with the idea of "putting the interests of others first."

Within America we see many groups with extremely divergent interests and concerns living in relative harmony. The atheists and the born agains don’t much like each other, but they don’t generally kill each other. In many parts of the world nations with histories of conflict are trading together and dealing with each other without open hostility.

These things happen for a reason. They happen because members of groups acknowledge that maintaining overall peace and relative harmony is more important than the interests of any one group, even if that sometimes means that groups must accept decisions that run counter to their interests.

It’s less a matter of putting our interests above those of others than of comparing long-term interests to short-term interests. The long-term desire to keep peace and to create a system where the interests of all are considered equally is often more important than getting one’s way at any particular moment.

If these things can within a diverse nation, they can happen within a diverse world, if enough people are willing to work to make them happen. That doesn’t mean they will happen, but I believe that they can.

Now wasn’t I the one you were calling a congenital pessimist?
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext