Foreign Affairs Discussion Group Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: FaultLine who started this subject	5/5/2003 10:27:50 AM
From: carranza2	Read Replies (1) of 281500

Lots and lots of articles on N. Korea at site listed below. The lead one is interesting as it concludes that US options are two: A military strike or interdiction of NK shipments to make sure nuclear material is not being tansferred to other miscreants. How effective can the second option be? One mistake could be deadly. The first option is not so great, either. The approach to NK reminds me of tek's definiton of foreign policy: Attempts to make choices that suck the least. In this case, I'm not sure which option fits the bill. From a long term perspective, it is absolutely clear that the nuts in NK have to be disarmed. They are simply too dangerous. How is that accomplished without incurring a tremendous cost in SK? Bright ideas accepted. armscontrol.org

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next