Dave > Your sources are very left wing and liberal.
Clearly any reference you don't like is branded that way but I won't argue with you about that. In fact, I accept they sometimes are because, politically, I have no particular leaning one way or the other. What concerns me is the truth --- if there is such a thing?
Thus I am not interested in whether Ritter is left wing, liberal, pedophile, gay, pervert or whatever, but in what he said.
Which is that Bush told lies about the weapons of mass destruction. So far, Ritter is correct. There are no weapons of mass destruction.
Maybe they will find some? Maybe they will even "plant" some? Who knows? But so far, there aren't any.
Here's another source. I can't say if it's left wing, commie or what. Further, I don't know who the "senior officials" are, or indeed, if there are any. I cite the reference for what it's worth.
sundayherald.com
>>>The Bush administration has admitted that Saddam Hussein probably had no weapons of mass destruction.
Senior officials in the Bush administration have admitted that they would be 'amazed' if weapons of mass destruction (WMD) were found in Iraq.<<<
Ritter's morals are not on the line. He has already been stigmatized. The morals under scrutiny are those of the man he accuses. The one you admire.
> That is the way it is in middle America
I am sure it is and that is why I enjoy debating with you. We both know that we see things differently from each other but I don't think that means we can't converse. In fact, it's possibly a good thing we are 10,000 miles apart --- if I lived in the US we probably wouldn't speak to each other! |
