COMS & the Ghost of USRX w/ other STUFF Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : COMS & the Ghost of USRX w/ other STUFF

COMS 0.00130

-18.8%

Nov 7 11:47 AM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Dee Jay who wrote (3028)	8/2/1997 4:50:00 PM
From: David Lawrence	of 22053

Okay, okay. We've debated this ad nauseum more than once. The point is that Ascend management was part of the process, we were not, and some of us were far, far more accurate about the Flex deployment timetable than those purportedly in-the-know. By the way, one thing I did know was that pre-Flex Ascend modem cards housed 68-pin chipset sockets, and the design for Rockwell's firmware upgradeable chipset was for an 84-pin design. I know that a 84-pin chipset will not fit into a 68-pin socket. My guess is that Ascend knew that too. Also, early on (I don't remember which month) Rockwell projected full production schedules in June. I know that because Rockwell recently stated they were on target for their original production schedules, and when I went and researched the original press release, sure enough that's what they said. Shouldn't Ascend have known that? Oh well. It'll all soon be vague memories, we hope.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next