<font color=blue> You wrote:"you will see that agents were developed, but then destroyed once they proved to have more drawbacks than benefits."<font color=black>
Once again, for some reason, you would rather believe Saddam Hussein. You have accepted everything that Saddam said, regardless of evidence pointing to the contrary.
Why has the UN kept sanctions on Iraq for 12 years, in punishment for their WMD programs, if those programs didn't exist? Why did Saddam allow UN sanctions to be used against Iraq, if he had no WMD programs?
Remember, "Iraq told the United Nations in 1995 it had produced 30,000 liters of biological agents, including anthrax and other toxins it could put on missiles. U.N. officials say the actual amount may be three or four times greater."
Would you stake your life, your family's life on your assumption that the brutal, inhuman Saddam got rid of ALL 30,000+ liters of biological agents? |
