SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Austrian Economics, a lens on everyday reality

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: gpowell who wrote (221)5/8/2003 5:48:53 PM
From: Don Lloyd  Read Replies (1) of 445
 
gpowell,

To me, the interesting problem in labor is why wage rates tend to be sticky.

My ranking selection mechanism would tend to give that result in two ways.

First, the candidates on the low end of the ranking would tend not to be able to gain employment by simply reducing their wage demands. If most hires are made by choosing a top ranked candidate out of nine, it is likely that the ninth ranked candidate will have difficulty finding a competition that he can rank first in after allowing for what are probably negative intangibles, even if they are merely interview difficulties.

Secondly, when a company must cut back its labor to match its reduced product demand, it probably uses a ranking system in reverse. This means that the employees with the least future value to the company, and likely the lowest wages, will be differentially let go. The average wages of the laid off workers will be less than the average wages of the retained ones, leading to an increase in average salary for the retained workforce.

Regards, Don
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext