SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Bald Eagle who wrote (404635)5/9/2003 2:08:58 PM
From: Skywatcher  Read Replies (1) of 769670
 
Shadow Over the Oil Fields
Los Angeles Times

Thursday 08 May 2003

The administration's no-bid contract with a Halliburton subsidiary gives the
impression of a grab of Iraqi resources for American business.

The Bush administration is becoming its own enemy in Iraq. Secretary of State Colin L. Powell,
White House spokesman Ari Fleischer and other top-ranking officials have clearly stated that the
country's oil fields will belong to Iraqis. But a May 2 letter from the Army Corps of Engineers to
Rep. Henry A. Waxman (D-Los Angeles) indicates that it has awarded a no-bid contract to a
subsidiary of Halliburton Co. called KBR to run the oil fields until August — and maybe longer.

The administration has revealed as little about the contract as possible, a withholding of
information that is compounded by Vice President Dick Cheney's long-standing ties to Halliburton.
The contract was issued March 8 but not disclosed until March 24. Then the corps revealed April 8
that the contract was worth up to $7 billion.

All along, the administration has left the impression that the no-bid contract was only for
extinguishing oil wells and repairs. And Halliburton gave no indication that it was doing anything
more than putting out oil fires. Now the corps is indicating that the company will basically operate
the oil fields. It also says the "best estimate" for awarding a new contract is "approximately the
end of August" but the current contract could last until January 2004. The corps is also preparing a
new, long-term contract for operating the fields. Why? Aren't the Iraqis supposed to do this
themselves? Shouldn't they at least be the ones to cobble together the contracts?

The administration's failure to be forthright about the bid is creating the impression of impropriety.
KBR may indeed be the best company to work on the oil fields, but the no-bid contract didn't give
anyone else a chance to present their capabilities. What's more, the company has a history of
overcharging the government. In 1997, the General Accounting Office found that the firm had billed
the Army for questionable expenses. Last year, KBR paid $2 million in fines to resolve fraud
claims over work at a military base.

Now the Halliburton subsidiary is being rewarded with potential control over Iraqi oil fields. The
administration may be guilty of cronyism or nothing more than having murky plans for Iraq. Either
way, it needs to quickly resolve the impression that it's grabbing Iraq's oil fields for American
companies.
CC
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News