SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : SI vs. iHub - Battle of the Boards Part 2
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: mmmary who wrote (4428)5/9/2003 7:55:37 PM
From: David Lawrence  Read Replies (1) of 5315
 
Are we talking about the same thing? Which part of "plead guilty" don't you understand? Are you of the opinion that nobody was scammed in the case of the insurance fraud conviction? Or in the case where he traded testimony in exchange for testimony in the stock promotion kickback incident in '94? These are victimless acts? I think there is ample record to state it as either opinion or fact.

Run-ins with and fines by the NASD. A arbitration settlement with his own mother for making unauthorized trades in her account. Now, a grand jury in New York has indicted him. Do you see a trend here?

Even if he somehow manages to get out of the current charges, it doesn't negate all of the prior acts.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News