Look what you wrote, you really believe we should attack North Korea? And you were suppose to be worried about the loss of life in Iraq?
Saddam did have WMDs, he used them, UN inspection didn't work, sanctions didn't work. Liberation worked great. Saddam plotted to kill a US president, Saddam attacked his neighbors, Saddam housed terrorists that did directly threaten the US, Saddam threatened to effect all economies that use oil. Saddam is gone with very little loss of life, fewer people died than Saddam would have killed during the same time period.
North Korea: Kim Jong-il is a two-bit dictator, an unstable child with nuclear weapons, which he wouldn't have had if Clinton hadn't been president. He hasn't attacked his neighbors nor used chemical weapons on his own people. And you think that we should handle him the same as Saddam?
North Korea is already isolated sanctions or not, they kicked out the UN monitors. North Korea has no global impact unless he uses nuclear weapons, which he would if you were control. There is no appeasement going on, after Clinton left office, what has he gained from Bush? If he acts on his threats he will be toast. |
