SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Austrian Economics, a lens on everyday reality

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Don Lloyd who wrote (229)5/11/2003 6:56:38 PM
From: gpowell  Read Replies (1) of 445
 
Don,

The quoted paragraph is not in accordance with your previous expectations - you were making a case for a wage and performance ranking system within the same job class.

Delong is saying average wages appear countercyclical because below average jobs are disproportionately lost.

The very next paragraph states:

Correcting for this "composition of employment" effect, the balance of the evidence is that in the average business cycle real wages are slightly procyclical: a particular job with particular skill requirements tends to carry higher real wages in a boom than in a recession (see Barsky and Solon, 1993). Real wages are high in booms because demand for investment goods is high in booms--and thus the derived demand for labor is high in booms as well.

A procyclical wage seems to invalidate your pay for rank system.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext