GUMM - Eliminate the Common Cold Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Biotech / Medical : GUMM - Eliminate the Common Cold

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: StockDung who wrote (4392)	5/13/2003 8:55:25 AM
From: DanZ	Read Replies (5) of 5582

You're wrong, Floyd. I haven't always been wrong about this stock. Like others, including shorts and longs, I have been right and wrong. All one has to do is look at the dates of my posts, where the stock was trading, and where it subsequently traded. I don't see how you can consider shorting at 10, 12, 14, before the run to 36 being right, but you're entitled to your opinion. I predicted that this stock would trade to 32 when it was trading at about 18 in late 1999. Was I right? It actually traded $4 higher than that. The shorts have been wrong about this company's growth and even today don't give them credit where credit is due. You and the rest of the shorts that read this thread are still avoiding my question. What is your rationale for holding a short position in this company today? Surely you don't think that a stock trading at 2.5 times sales with 40% top line growth, an estimated 80% bottom line growth, and a PEG of 0.3 is overvalued. Face it Floyd. You are holding a short position in this company out of spite, and your emotional decision will eventually cost you.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next