My first post on this thread was #223. This is what I said:
As I have long pointed out, the tactics of the Office of the Special Prosecutor were not unusual by the standards of the profession, although they were, in fact, aggressive. Also, since Starr is a corporate attorney, he relied on the professionals that he hired for guidance about investigatory techniques. Finally, his office was subjected to a relentless attack by unscrupulous partisans...
What you can possibly derive to criticize out of that beats me. Beyond that, I cannot say that I am usually impressed with your coherence. Sometimes I have had to doubt that English is your native language, since you generally express yourself so poorly. Thus, it is hard to care about your evaluation of my logic.
I have not run away, I have tired of your (and kenny's) nonsense, on top of the usual cacophony of the thread. Since most arguments I have here I have had dozens of times before, it gets stale.
I do not care about sports at all. My first argument with you had to do with a reading of the rule book, nothing more.
I am sorry that you associate knowing what one is talking about with arguing from an Ivory Tower....... |
