SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: bela_ghoulashi who wrote (98888)5/23/2003 9:56:29 AM
From: thames_sider  Read Replies (2) of 281500
 
The men on the ground knew nothing of this. They cannot be faulted personally, as individuals, as men in combat, for not having the benefit of hindsight beforehand.

Agreed. Probably they were following SOP for hostile and possibly occupied territory. But they *should* have known it was no such thing.
Remember, there was that orderly or ward assistant who tipped us off? Did he give wrong information, and imply there were Iraqi troops everywhere? Did no one at all ask him "Are there any soldiers"?

Sending in a SWAT team, guns blazing and gung-ho, is all fine and dramatic and I agree it made a great story. But if this was actually a cooked-up drama when they could have just sent an ambulance to fetch her - and some people at least DID OR SHOULD have known this - then it's significant, no?

Or do you think it's OK to lie to your troops and send them in with obviously inadequate if not blatantly false information, on a wasted, damaging and unnecessary mission? ...
Do you think it's OK to treat our soldiers as toys for good headlines?
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext