Booms, Busts, and Recoveries Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Booms, Busts, and Recoveries

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: elmatador who wrote (34374)	5/26/2003 10:01:38 PM
From: yard_man	Read Replies (2) of 74559

you miss the pt, elmatador. Fuel cells aren't an alternative to fossil fuels -- they use fossil fuels -- fuel cells are only a different means for converting the chemical energy into electrical energy into mechanical energy and right now -- despite the nice "thermodynamic efficiency" of fuel cells converting the hydrogen gas into electrical energy and the low emissions (though, it is stupid to talk only of the environmental impact of the emissions, IMO) -- fuel cells are still not economic on a large scale ... Kyros is also correct in pointing out -- it is the peak of production that matters as far as the price of fossil fuels are concerned and it is likely we are nearing that peak. And if you think about it -- increasing the cost of natural gas or oil -- if the increases are concurrent -- does nothing to make fuel cells more economic. Now if oil became very expensive relative to the price of natural gas you might have some advantages for fuel cells in transportation -- but how likely is that??

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next