SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Moderate Forum

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Greg or e who wrote (1659)5/28/2003 2:03:14 PM
From: rrufff  Read Replies (1) of 20773
 
Clinton's private life ended when he swore to tell the truth and then lied to the court. His private life does not allow him to sexually force himself upon women. Why the double standard for him? Bank robbers have private lives to should we ignore their behavior as well?

There is some truth to your post but I think most Americans feel that the money wasted on teh investigation and the focus by opponents was worse than the "crime." I think he was foolish in doing what he did. There is no credible evidence whatsover that he ever "forced" himself on women. He had willing, albeit misguided, recipients.

He was very foolish. Yet there was no need to spend $60 million on the investigation. If the Pope were to be investigated with that many resources, I bet you'd find some surprising details. Without that wasted effort, the Press still would have discovered the salacious details.

I am not a Clinton supporter in general but I find it very foolish to waste time arguing about his sexual indiscretions.

Should he have gone after terrorists with more zeal? Yes . OTOH, his administration had much upon which history will bring praise, but that's another story.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext