COMS & the Ghost of USRX w/ other STUFF Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : COMS & the Ghost of USRX w/ other STUFF

COMS 0.00130

-18.8%

Nov 7 11:47 AM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Dee Jay who wrote (3052)	8/4/1997 11:37:00 AM
From: drmorgan	of 22053

Consequently putting 84-pin sockets on new circuit boards or cards was not out of the question and easily accomodated. Dee Jay, easily accomodated but the circuit board has to be re-designed, well at least partially. The socket's are different size so most likely what happened is they had to move other components on the board to accomodate the larger socket but that results in time to make the design changes plus building and assembling new boards. Also they would most likely (but not absoulutley) have to resubmit the boards to the regulatory agencies for approval. All this takes time and the days click by and at that time the x2 was taking off. Derek

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next