Foreign Affairs Discussion Group Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (99467)	5/29/2003 11:29:23 PM
From: Lou Weed	Read Replies (2) of 281500

Sorry Nadine, let me clarify.....I didn't mean you specifically when I wrote that sentence, it was more of a general observation. As for Gallaway and Ritter....don't know them from Adam, sorry! With regards to Tony Benn's quote....I referenced it as I thought it was a good point from the article. There are lots of issues where I totally disagree with him but on this I think he's spot on. Doesn't make the issue any less relevant. <<The argument that he never had them, that he forfeited $200 billion in oil revenues to perpetrate a hoax (after having used them too) is to absurd to take seriously.>> To argue he never had them is wrong, we all know he HAD them prior to '91. The issue is that we were told he had a massive arsenal of them NOW and that they were an imminent threat. Therein lies the crux of the matter.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next