SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: epicure who wrote (1617)5/30/2003 1:41:20 AM
From: D. Long  Read Replies (1) of 793800
 
The matter under discussion isn't about what John or I believe are the ethics of regulating what consenting adults may do, but rather what the law IS. I frankly don't give a flying tutu what anybody does in their bedroom, and really don't want to hear about it! ;)

The court has decided that the states may regulate out of marriage sexual acts. That is, that there is no protected privacy right to non-heterosexual, non-marriage sex. That's the case law in a nutshell, as was very well summarized in the piece by the Princeton law prof. The whole deal is John thinks Rick Santorum is a bigoted homophobe because he paraphrased the substantive legal issue, and everyone with an axe wanted it ground on him. I continue to beat myself against the Rock of John in hopes he may, for once, change his opinion.

Derek
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News