SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Neocon who wrote (99515)5/30/2003 11:04:10 AM
From: Win Smith  Read Replies (1) of 281500
 
Of course not. You would never indict "anyone in particular". You're into "complex thought", like the subtle distinction between hating Clinton and merely "despising" him.

As I said near the beginning, if Perle and friends don't want people making too much of him, Perle ought to just shut up and quit blowing his own triumphalist horn at every opportunity. I sure didn't make up the "architect of the Bush doctrine" line. Of course, now Rummy's enlisted Newt to push his current infighting battle against Powell, State, and anybody else who might doubt the wisdom of the current "hell with Afghanistan and Iraq, it's on to Iran" line. I don't think the "anti-semitic" line will do much for Newt, but I'm sure the pundits will come up with something.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News