SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: tejek who wrote (170199)5/30/2003 6:45:24 PM
From: TimF  Read Replies (1) of 1582625
 
Conservatives do recognize that different crimes can be more or less severe. They also recognize that perjury is a relatively severe crime.

Assuming that no WMD are found, what should be Bush's punishment?

The political hit he will take. Lying should properly cause such a hit, but it isn't a crime unless its under oath. If the hit is enough for him to lose his reelection bid then that will be a more severe punishment then most politicians get for lying.

No WMD found does not equal proof of a lie, but it would suggest that it wasn't unreasonable to believe that the WMD claims where lies. Also even if it was not a lie it would be an example of setting policy on poor or biased intelligence estimates which doesn't look good for the administration, so there should be some political hit either way.

I don't disagree but before the war started, this was not the reason the war was deemed necessary. Therefore, I find its sudden surfacing as the reason to topple Saddam somewhat suspect.

Suspect of what? The reason was mentioned, even if it was not given as much weight as WMD.

Tim
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext