SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Stockman Scott's Political Debate Porch

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: SOROS who started this subject5/31/2003 1:36:51 AM
From: Proud Deplorable   of 89467
 
Sean Penn defends Baghdad visit in New York Times ad
Fri May 30, 2:26 PM ET

NEW YORK (AFP) - Actor and anti-war activist Sean Penn answered controversy surrounding his December visit to Baghdad in a paid, full-page advertisement in The New York Times.

Penn's sometimes philosophical, sometimes poetic comments ran under the title "Kilroy's still here." He justified his three-day visit to Baghdad, which some called treasonous.

He said the US-led invasion of Iraq (news - web sites) was, "done without any credible evidence of imminent threat to the United States.

"Our flag has been waving, it seems, in servicing a regime change significantly benefiting US corporations."

"Our Secretary of State presented plagiarized evidence of WMD (weapons of mass destruction) in Iraq to the American people and the world," Penn wrote in reference to US Secretary of State Colin Powell (news - web sites)'s justification for war before the United Nations (news - web sites) Security Council.

"We see Bechtel, we see Halliburton," he said in reference to companies that have benefited from contracts to rebuild Iraq.

"We see no WMD's. We see dead young Americans. We see no WMD's. We see dead Iraqi civilians. We see no WMD's. We see chaos in the Baghdad streets. But no WMD's."

The actor, 42, ended his text with an appeal to readers to make their voices heard and vote.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext