mmmary, you are incorrect. Prior to any further posts about this little upset you have, you might wish to review the legal definition, it is quite different from your suggested definition.
lectlaw.com
Suggesting that "you bet" that the SEC is investigating [fill in the name] for some alleged criminal act, here in a public forum, is very, very close to libel; your "truth" has nothing to do with it. If I were you, I would move along and not bother with this "truth" about SI and IHUB. I doubt you will ever be allowed to see the truth of what is undoubltedly a private business transaction that is none of your business.
Additionally, when you "say" something that is defamatory, it is slander, not libel. Libel is written, similar to the post you wrote that I am responding to. You may also wish to review the Terms of Use on this site. As I understand it, it's a violation to start personally attacking the character of another member by publishing rumors and innuendo.
Personally I feel you should be suspended from this site for your prior messages, but I don't own the site, so my opinion doesn't count. |
