Stockman Scott's Political Debate Porch Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Stockman Scott's Political Debate Porch

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Mannie who wrote (19867)	6/3/2003 2:18:07 PM
From: jlallen	Read Replies (1) of 89467

You concede my first two points.....as for the rest.... fact: The link to international terrorism has been confirmed. very broad brush stroke here... Two words....Salman Pak. A huge terrorist training facility. The nuclear threat that we heard so much about? bs It is much to early to tell if the nuclear threat was overstated. It took the UN three years following the Gulf War to uncover the extent of the program. There is no disagreement that Saddam wanted nukes. Moreover, even if the nuke threat was overstated this would represent a failure of intelligence, not a deception as Bush hating morons are found of claiming....and moreover, in light of what has already been either conceded or discovered in Iraq to question the justification for the war at this point is more than a bit illogical.... Tons & tons of bioweapons? bs Incorrect statement and contrary to the facts. Facts are the UN documented tons of these weapons prior to their expulsion in 98. No accounting for these weapons has ever been made. Iraq refused to verify their destruction in any credible way despite adequate opportunity to do so.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next