SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: LindyBill who wrote (1811)6/4/2003 5:06:40 PM
From: Lazarus_Long   of 793843
 
If she had been a man, this would not have happened.
I don't agree with that. Women are getting to be like blacks: any you bust one of them for anything, you're a sexist/racist.

OTOH, I do agree she has been singled out. A DA saw an opportunity to make some REALLY BIG headlines- -nationwide, even! And wham! Something that ordinarily would be settled with no action or a slap on the wrist ends up with a criminal indictment.

But Martha did everything she could to attract attention to herself prior to this. That set this situation up, not her gender.

OK. Maybe she made $200K she shouldn't have. How does that compare to the amount stolen through fraudulent earnings reports from other CEOs? Where were the federal investigation and the indictments for the price fixing during the CA energy crisis? The amount stolen there makes her look like a kid who got caught with her hand in the cookie jar. And essentially nothing has happened.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext