Stockman Scott's Political Debate Porch Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Stockman Scott's Political Debate Porch

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Mannie who wrote (20028)	6/5/2003 1:05:48 PM
From: jlallen	Read Replies (1) of 89467

1. Most of the prosecutions for the ENRON boys are scheduled for later this year...and I think there are dozens of Martha Stewarts and she is getting hit only because she is THE Martha Stewart. 2. There is no credible evidence of "lying". There may be some evidence of another intelligence failure if no weapons are found....but your basic premise is flawed. It was not the burden of the Bush Administration to show that there were weapons...it was Saddam's burden to show there were none. He did not. In fact the Al-Samouds violated the UNSCR. He openly flouted the UNSCRs ending the Gulf War. Blix again yesterday reaffirmed that the list of unanswered questions was never really dealt with by Saddam. Saddam stole billions from the oil for food program and kept his people in a shocking state of poverty. There is Salman Pak. There is Abu Abbas. There are the payments to homicide bombers families. The link to Al Quaeda has been established..... In short, aside from the partisan political nature of the "No WMD" chanting by Bush hating morons....the facts indicate that the Administration was more than justified in its decision making.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next