SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Moderate Forum
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Glenn Petersen who wrote (1909)6/5/2003 5:57:29 PM
From: Dale Baker  Read Replies (2) of 20773
 
Saddam is gone so it follows that the troops should depart. Of course, the U.S. will still have a major presence in the area.

So without Saddam, there is less threat and need for US troops. But the US will still have a major presence in the area....but it won't be in Saudi....so there is a threat to the region still...but it doesn't need to be countered by US troops in Saudi...but it does need to be countered by US troops elsewhere in the region...and its name is?????????

I'll give you a few minutes to unkink yourself from that game of Twister. Did I forget to mention we promised not to have bases in Iraq long-term? Where will they be then?
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News