SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: D. Long who wrote (100495)6/6/2003 8:10:59 AM
From: thames_sider  Read Replies (2) of 281500
 
Don't you see, you're contradicting yourself. How can you write this...
Saddam knowingly provided a safe haven to an active international terrorist network.
and this?
Ansur al-Islam was based in the mountains along the Iranian border, and had forcibly taken several villages tenuously under Kurdish control.

this group took land - Saddam didn't provide them any safe haven, they took land that we'd blocked him from keeping in his dictatorship. If they took the land from anyone, it ws the Kurds, or us.

Because Ansur al-Islam controlled that area. Like it says above. "Ansar al-Islam, t-h-a-t c-o-n-t-r-o-l-s t-h-i-s c-o-r-n-o-r o-f I-r-a-q."
You're the stupid one who's unable to read...
But Baghdad has an agent in the most senior levels of the radical organization, Ansar al-Islam, that controls this corner of Iraq. In 2000 this agent offered al-Qaida safe haven in the region.
In other words, they weren't there before. Whether or not this agent existed, if he offered this group a safe haven, it's nothing to do with Saddam because it wasn't his control to give.
You're the one incapable of understanding the pap you spurt at me...

Sorry, you're wasting too much of my time. Have as many last words as you wish.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext