SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: tejek who wrote (170709)6/6/2003 3:41:20 PM
From: Tenchusatsu  Read Replies (1) of 1583477
 
Ted, if you're going to change your story, you might as well be honest about it. But let me go first.

I was once of the opinion that if we don't find any WMD in Iraq, Bush will have heck to pay. Now I'm taking a step back from that. Why? Because it's clear to me that Saddam probably destroyed his WMD stockpiles, or at least given them to someone else. This was no doubt in response to the inspections and Bush's sabre-rattling. But Saddam clearly had no intention of staying WMD-less, and as soon as the world turned its back again, Saddam would resume his programs. The mobile biolabs that we found are an indication of that.

Personally, I'm glad that Saddam's gone. Was our intelligence faulty on the existence of WMD? Perhaps at that time, but I'll bet it wasn't before Iraq came under Bush's crosshairs.

OK, now it's your turn. Admit to me that the Dems are changing their story as we speak, that they're pretending they knew it all along. Even John McCain isn't siding with the Dems this time.

Tenchusatsu
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext