SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Noel de Leon who wrote (100594)6/7/2003 3:00:06 PM
From: Hawkmoon  Read Replies (2) of 281500
 
What I care about is that the US government has lied to the public.

Noel..

Yes or no.. Did the Iraqis fake that document discovered in 1998:

During a routine inspection in July 1998, UNSCOM found a document showing the use of CW munitions during the Iran/Iraq war, revealing major discrepancies in Iraqi declarations. Iraqi "minders" accompanying the inspectors snatched the document back, and Iraq has still not allowed UNSCOM access to it. 31,000 CW munitions and 4,000 tonnes of precursor chemicals that Iraq claims to have destroyed unilaterally still have to be properly accounted for.

special.fco.gov.uk

Because that's the basis for the belief that Saddam's regime still possesed Chemical Warheads. They LIED to the UN about how many warheads they used against Iran..

The discrepancy was 6,000 Warheads. 6,000 of them..

Where are they Noel?

And futhermore, why is it that you think that everyone who TAKES IRAQI DOCUMENTATION AT FACE VALUE is a liar and a fraud??

They apparently documented how many warheads they expended against in the Iran-Iraq war.. But you're ready to believe they couldn't properly account for destroyed weapons, RIGHT??

Is this what you are trying to convince us to believe?

Would you rather believe the denials of a criminal who has been caught red-handed, or the notes he kept to himself detailing how he would commit his crime.

Btw, you're not related to Thomas M., are you?? There seems to be a striking similarity in your logic and responses.

Hawk
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News