MEDX ... anybody following? Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Biotech / Medical : MEDX ... anybody following?

MEDX 31.58

+1.4%

Nov 5 12:44 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Icebrg who wrote (676)	6/7/2003 5:13:25 PM
From: Icebrg	Read Replies (1) of 2240

From my earlier post: >>Results: Three patients had objective cancer regression, including one with a complete response with resolution of two subcutaneous masses, 31 lung nodules and one brain metastasis.>> We have now got some scans to show. Interesting stuff, really. This is metastatic melanoma. It is a very serious condition and normally only possible to treat with IL-2. Few respond and no one will like the treatment. IL-2 is pretty bad. Results seen with the patient who had a complete response. Lugn metastasis before and after. images.visualwebcaster.com Brain metastasis before and after. images.visualwebcaster.com Quite impressive even if only seen in one patient out of 14. But I don't think IL-2 does much better. This result was discussed at the Y! Medarex board, which from time to time (but not always) can be quite useful. How is it possible that MDX-010, which is a mAb can influence a metastasis inside the brain? One would expect that the BBB would stop all efforts to influence the disease mAb-wise. Surfson8 provides what appears to be the correct answer: High affinity T cells by: surfson8 06/07/03 03:37 pm Msg: 75166 of 75169 One of the most interesting points made by Allison during the webcast was that CTLA-4 particularly targets the high affinity T cells and that 010 therefore elevates high affinity T cells. These cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTL) should be qualitatively superior to those produced ordinarily. Another exciting point was that CTL can be generated by 010 even when CD4 T cells are missing. This is part of the rationale for testing 010 in HIV patients. As to the brain activity, 010 enhances T cell activation during a process called antigen presentation whereby specific T cells are produced. This process is thought to occur primarily in lymph nodes draining a tissue and not in the tissue itself. Once the antigen specific T cells are generated, they can migrate into the brain. The antibody therefore only has to have access to the lymph nodes. Since large quantities of blood perfuse lymph nodes, and their vessels are leaky, access is not a problem. This is of course extremely positive. Being able to influence brain metastases without having to introduce the mAb inside the BBB. And it works (according to my "calculations") not only for the problems of getting access to the CNS. mAbs also have a hard time getting access inside solid tumors. Problems with access, high internal pressure etc. But we have the same situation for these tumors. It is not necessary at all for MDX-010 to gain access inside the tumor. The T-cells will take care of that. And they will even be extra potent. The other side of the coin is however that this type of treatment will generate negative side-effects. In most patients auto-immune responses were seen. But they seem to be possible to manage. All in all, a very interesting development. I don't think MDX-010 got the recognition in media, that it deserved. But it is possible to stay ahead. Listen to the webcast available from Medarex's side and from which presentation the above slides were pulled. Erik

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next