SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Hawkmoon who wrote (100616)6/8/2003 1:46:18 AM
From: Bilow  Read Replies (3) of 281500
 
Hi Hawkmoon; Re: "Yes or no.. Did the Iraqis fake that document discovered in 1998: ..."

It don't matter. That was 1998. Back when Clinton was in office.

Bush is in trouble for telling us that the Iraqis had WMDs in 2003, not in 1998.

Heck, we all already knew that the Iraqis lied in 1998.

What's at issue is the question of who was telling the truth in 2003, not in 1998.

This type of evidence might be used to show why Bush would hesitate to believe Saddam was telling the truth. But Bush did not tell us that he was doubtful of Saddam. What he said, and what he had his minions repeat, was that he had cold hard proof that Saddam was still lying in 2003.

In short, your long post is just another example of what every liar does when caught in a lie. He points out another liar and says that he wasn't the only one.

But nice try at changing the subject.

-- Carl
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News