Hi KLP; Re: " The left and anti war folks was/were very wrong too....said that going into Iraq would kill thousands of American troops."
I was anti war (though I am right wing). In fact, I thought that the idea of a war was so stupid that there was no way that Bush and Blair would really do it. And I repeatedly stated on this thread that we could easily defeat Iraq's military forces, but that we'd be thrown out of the country by the civilian opposition. For example:
Bilow, March 24, 2003
...
Back in WW1, it was possible to kill large numbers of soldiers by grinding them up at a stationary war front. But the Iraqis do not have a sufficiently strong military to create a front that would last the years required.
Instead, we'll be in Baghdad in days, if not weeks. And faced with a sullen, unbeaten, unbowed population that will shoot the shit out of us, just like Vietnam.
... #reply-18743807
Bilow, March 7, 2003
...
I've noted before that the belief that the residents of Baghdad will come out with flowers for us is a delusion. Also note that I predicted within a few days of 9/11 that the Afghans would greet us with flowers. The difference is simple.
... #reply-18671309
Bilow, March 6, 2003
That was a hell of an article. Here's some selected quotes for those who think that occupying a hostile nation where the civilians follow a nutcase religion and are armed to the teeth is child's play:
... #reply-18667372
Bilow, March 5, 2003
Hi Sig; It's all fantasy. Everyone knows, Saddam included, that his forces are no match for ours. That's why he's so willing to destroy those missiles.
The dangerous part of Iraq is their civilians, not their military. The problem weapons, as far as a US occupation goes, are rifles, grenades and pistols. #reply-18657990
Bilow, December 6, 2002
As far as resistance goes, there are two different things to calculate / estimate. The first is the degree of military opposition (will the Iraqi military fight back). The second is the degree of civilian opposition (will the Iraqi population support Iraqi "freedom fighters" against an occupying force).
I believe that the Iraqi military would fight back, to a certain extent, but the US has more than enough power to crush them fairly quickly anyway. The problem is in the civilian support for "freedom fighters".
As far as whether this will happen or not, I don't think it is even necessary to argue it. Our troops are already getting shot up regularly in Kuwait, where our relations are the best in all of the Arab, if not Moslem world. In the face of these incidents, to expect that our troops will not face an Iraqi intifada is optimistic at best. #reply-18310807
-- Carl
P.S. We could get the butcher bill up to "thousands of American troops", but it would require us stick around long after it becomes obvious that it is a lost cause. Right now we're losing about one a day or so. That will triple well before the end of the year. At that rate, we get to the thousand level sometime next year. Right when Bush is running for reelection. |
