A little more than half a century ago, Vinayak Savarkar was on trial for his life, accused of conspiring with seven other men in the assassination of Mohandas K. Gandhi on Jan. 30, 1948. The court acquitted Savarkar, citing insufficient evidence, but there was never much doubt about where his sympathies lay
If There was insufficient evidence, how could there be proof beyond reasonable doubt ? I dont subscribe to the line of thought of that organization, but I do feel, gross generalization is flawed.
..... <Point examples over a few years do not make your point>
Never lived in India. Yes, that's my view. Do you want to debate, or curse?
Debate when without bias is my preference. When you live in India for a few years and then express your opinions on your life there, I will be happy to listen and discuss. I dont express too many opinions on life in the US, coz I have not lived here long enough. I have lived in India for more than half my life. Why dont you spend a few years there, and then see if your Hindu/Muslim slant is valid ? |
