SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : The Boxing Ring Revived

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Lazarus_Long who wrote (6374)6/11/2003 4:30:59 PM
From: one_less  Read Replies (1) of 7720
 
It is a tricky question. On the one hand mental illness must be defined as a disease; As in, dis-ease. How can anyone who commits a serious violent crime not be struggling emotionally or mentally with the event? And if they are not, doesn't that kind of indicate that they are outside the norm. The problem then becomes what is the Mental Health profession feeling at dis-ease with. Any emotional struggle, or mental discomfort could be defined as dis-ease and; many mental health professionals dive head first into this myre of the indefinite.

Finally, at what point do we consider the suffering of a mentally ill prisoner to be cruel and unusual punishment?

At one extreme you could say that most people in prison are feeling dis-ease emotionally. So, everyone qualifies for services. At the other extreme you can define it as only those persons having a clinical diagnosis of a serious mental disorder. There have always been challenges to what or who qualifies. Disorders labels come and go depending on what we are feeling dis-ease about at any given time. Even where specific serious clinical disorders are defined, claims of cures or management are indecisive. One person's management technique is another person's nightmare of torture.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext