Why would I bother; as I said before, its not the primary issue on the plate. If you are so concerned to prove your point, then you do the search and come up with the info.
Restating that, you're wrong but will be ****ed if you will admit it.
Well, you given the definitions of the socialist state and the one for the communist state but you left out the definition for the United Soviet Socialist Republic. You see Russia was ruled by a central authority of which Stalin was the head honcho as well as dictator of the country. Its called an oligarchy. As I previously pointed out.
Stalin also tended to be autocratic and reactionary and tyrannical and pedantic.....some other traits often identified with the right.
Yeah, you guys take the blame for this one too.
Oh. OK. Then point out a real Communist state as an example of the greatness of leftist philosphy. This one?
capitalism.org
Stalin also tended to be autocratic and reactionary and tyrannical and pedantic.....some other traits often identified with the right.
And some shining examples when when leftist beliefs are actually put into practice- -such as Lenin, Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot, Ho, ....
Maybe the communist party in the US but not the one in Russia.
Yeah, by that time the party in Russia was well aware of the cost of questioning their genius leader. He had taught them well.
Well, that's no surprise......I didn't say that they were best buds.
You didn't? Sure sounded like you meant to imply it.
After all, he was friends with Hitler, the ultimate conservative, until they had a falling out.
Please don't tell me you find Churchill to be a humble man.
It's hard to be humble when you are as great as Churchill was.
OTOH, leftists have much to be humble about. |
