Foreign Affairs Discussion Group Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Eashoa' M'sheekha who wrote (101369)	6/13/2003 6:19:06 PM
From: TimF	Read Replies (2) of 281500

“ Serious consequences “ as worded in res. 1441 was NOT…repeat N-O-T intended to mean anything other than what was to be determined in a second res. Serious consequences was used as a code word for military force, and not just in that resolution. We did agree to consult with the UN again before an invasion, but we did not agree to not invade if the UN didn't support it. Tim

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next