SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Win Lose or Draw : Be A Steve, Make A Call

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: augieboo who wrote (11419)6/15/2003 8:51:55 PM
From: Sojourner Smith  Read Replies (3) of 11447
 
The point was completely missed. @@
The point is in the position sizing and that
the bet is made on the thinking that an outcome
that is 50/50 would have to be evenly distributed
making more money before "risk of ruin."

My original point was: I was defending the argument that neural nets were no better than a coin toss. I stated that 50/50 could still be profitable with position sizing.
However, the goal is to get a net in 70% correct range.
The thing I like about neural nets is not the entry
but the exit. That is the main pitfall for me in using
any other method.

The question is: does any method people use that are posting
have better odds or even if they are right 80% of the right,
will they still lose money overall?

However, I am open to any high probability selection method
using fundamentals or TA.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext