SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Big Dog's Boom Boom Room
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: xxreno who wrote (24001)6/19/2003 11:38:16 PM
From: t4texas  Read Replies (2) of 206223
 
you are right i think. there are more lng port questions than answers. i have always thought that after they have put their thinking caps on "they" will conclude the lng delivery terminals will need to be constructed a few miles offshore or at least offshore. as far as i recall there are currently three lng locations in various states of completion in (i think) georgia, massachusetts, and (?maryland?).

here is a proposal that i have not heard, but i don't understand why it has not at least been proposed. put a ng pipeline into russia through alaska, and then north america has a "lifetime" supply of ng. they could eventually tie that pipeline into central asia and the mideast. we can't need more ng than that could supply. (yes, i understand there could be a pipeline security threat from time to time, but lng tankers are a security threat all the time. and yes, i understand that some would have the russians turning off the pipeline in some national emergency.)
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News