| If there are several explanations of a phenomenon, and they are all pretty reasonable, it is, indeed, prejudiced to insist upon one of them. Wondering what is true, or calling for further investigation, is sensible. Insisting that there was a big scam, when no one, not Blix, not the French, not Germany, denied that there were stockpiles, they only disagreed on how acute the situation was, is at best premature. After all, it is not merely that we are not finding what we expected, we are not finding what everyone expected..... |