Answer, [if you're defendant Christopher Rea, a/k/a Merlin]:
“Trading Places never had any advisory function whatsoever.”
- Supplemental Declaration of Christopher Rea Supporting Motion to Quash or Dismiss on Forum non Conveniens Grounds, February 13, 2003, p.2, 4.
“I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the States of California and Illinois that the foregoing is true and correct.”
DATED: February 13, 2003
[Signature of Christopher Rea] -
- Supplemental Rea Declaration, p.4, 1.
“Contrary to Plaintiff’s Opposition, Trading Places was not a ‘day trading advisory site.’ Also, contrary to Plaintiff’s Opposition, Plaintiff was not ‘given trading recommendations on securities transactions’ at that site.”
- Reply Memorandum Supporting Christopher Rea’s Motion to Quash and Trading Places, Inc.’s Motion to Quash or Dismiss on Forum non Conveniens Grounds, February 13, 2003, p.2, 2, “FACTS”.
“In fact, Trading Places had no advisory function whatsoever.”
- Rea Reply, p.2, Footnote 1, “FACTS”.
Gotta hand it to him, he is not shy, either. |
