SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Attack Iraq?
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: lorne who wrote (6654)6/25/2003 4:34:10 PM
From: Orcastraiter  Read Replies (1) of 8683
 
I supported the action in Afghanistan because the Taliban government harbored bin Laden and supported terrorist activities.

If someone attacks you, you have the right to attack back.

In the case of Saddam, I disagree with the way things were done. There was no connection between Al Qaeda and Saddam. There was no urgency as was presented with WMD. Bush screwed up by attacking Iraq. Saddam should have been dealt with in other ways. I don't understand why Bush lied about the intelligence.

Bush should have done things differently in Iraq. I disagree with the way he conducted diplomacy. The only excuse for it would be if the way he presented the urgent danger to the US to have been true. It was not true. And he knew it was not true. He had some other motives. What were they? He knew he had to do a sales job on the congress and the American people...and he did.

Orca
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News