Politics for Pros- moderated Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: mistermj who wrote (2669)	6/25/2003 7:49:53 PM
From: JohnM	Read Replies (5) of 793914

>> I don't have any use for Thomas, either<< Why? I'm tempted to just say "because." But seriously. Because he replaced Thurgood Marshall, one of the great justices and a genuinely special person. Because he has this inhuman and cramped view of the constitution. I, as you might guess, have no use for Scalia but he is clearly extremely bright. Not so with Thomas. I have no use for Rhenquist who was little more than an Arizona party hack when he was appointed by Nixon. And so it goes.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next