SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Moderate Forum

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: epicure who wrote (2489)6/26/2003 12:17:02 AM
From: coug  Read Replies (1) of 20773
 
Yes X,

But I am not surprised because in this system of government, which is fine with me, we can, as a society always produce more than we can consume.. Because to make a profit for their employer, a worker always has to produce more than s(he) can buy back.. Well to keep the ball rolling, the employer, has to "loan money" to the worker so they can keep buying back at the "company store"..

To make a long story short, eventually, the "richest" wind up with all the money, from their profits on the widgets, they made, plus the interest on ALL the money
the employees borrowed from the "bosses"..

Eventually, a parabolic relationship, a blowoff between producing and consuming is reached, when all the wealth is concentrated in a few hands, and then we have to work off this over capacity.. So we minions hunker down with a few nuts, we have stored, hopefully, until we use up everything and start all over again, the Kondrieff <sp> cycle.. (all great depressions have been preceeded by this "wealth concentration")

So we are hunkering down... <g>

m
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext